Breast Tumor – Case Discussion

52 y.o./ female with chief complaint of right breast mass.

 

4 month prior – noted right breast mass

 

PE

Right breast mass, 3 cm, solid, hard, ill-defined border, movable, tender,  very near subareolar area with no axillary node

 

Primary and Secondary Clinical Diagnoses?

 

Primary Clinical Diagnosis: Right breast mass, cancer

Secondary Clinical Diagnosis: Right breast mass, fibroadenoma

 

Bases for Clinical Diagnoses?

 

Bases for breast cancer –

Solid mass, hard, ill-defined border in a 52 y.o. patient (pattern recognition of breast cancer and prevalence of cancer in this age group)

 

Bases for fibroadenoma –

Solid movable mass and prevalence (fibroadenoma is the most common benign solid breast tumor)

Hard consistency and ill-defined border are subjective findings

 

Need for paraclinical diagnostic procedure?

 

  Degree of Certainty Plan of Treatment
Breast Cancer Not quite certain (70%) – ?hard, ill-defined, and age Modified radical mastectomy
Fibroadenoma (30%) Excision

 

Yes, need paraclinical diagnostic procedure because of uncertainty of clinical diagnosis at this point and plans of management for both primary and secondary diagnoses are markedly different.  Beside, if the mass turns out to be really breast cancer, the plan for modified radical mastectomy is still mutilating calling for a more definitive diagnosis prior to mastectomy.

 

What is the most cost-effective paraclinical diagnostic procedure?

 

  Benefit Risk Cost Availability
Biopsy Direct exam –  info (can be informative in 90% or more – can give a more definitive diagnosis of breast cancer in 90% of the time) Pain on needle puncture or cutting

Scar in open biopsy

PhP 1,000 A
Mammography Indirect exam – shadowing  (can be informative in 50% of the time) Radiation

Painful compression

PhP 1,000 A
Ultrasound Indirect exam – shadowing  (can\t tell whether malignant or benign if solid)

 

None? PhP 900 A

 

 

Benefit and cost wise with acceptable risk and availability, biopsy is the option of choice.

 

Between needle and open biopsy, needle is preferred because information can be gotten in more than 90% of the time.   Open biopsy will be informative in 98 to 99% of the time but it is more invasive than needle biopsy.

 

What to look for in biopsy?

Malignant cells

 

What are mammographic findings suggestive of breast cancer?

Cluster of microcalcifications

Spiculated mass

 

What are findings suggestive of benignity in ultrasound of a breast mass?

Cystic nature of the mass

 

Suppose the result of needle biopsy shows picture consistent with breast cancer.

What is the pretreatment diagnosis?

 

Right breast mass, breast cancer.

 

Goal of treatment?

Goal of treatment: to remove the mass with negligible chance of recurrence (local, regional, distant) (with the best survival results)

 

  Benefit Risk Cost Availability
Surgery 99% complete removal Side-effects of operation and anesthesia PhP 50,000 Available
Chemotherapy 60% response rate Side-effects of chemotherapy PhP 60,000 Available
Radiotherapy 70% response rate Side-effects of radiotherapy PhP80,000 Available

 

Cost in a private setting and includes professional fees

 

 

Benefit wise, surgery is the option of choice.

 

  Survival Rates / Recurrence Rates
Surgery  
Surgery + Chemotherapy  
Surgery + Radiotherapy  

 

 

Pathophysiology

 

 

Follow-up

 

Objectives:

Check results of treatment

Monitor for recurrence

Provide psychosocial support

 

 

Frequency of check-up:

 


ROJ@17nov14

This entry was posted in Breast Health Problem. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a comment